![]() The scope should be the name of the core component affected (as perceived by someone reading the changelog generated from commit messages). Some meta information in the repo changes (example scopes: owner files, editor config etc.) TypeĬhanges that affect the build system or external dependencies (example scopes: webpack, python, npm)Ĭhanges to our CI configuration files and scripts (example scopes: travis, zeus)Ī code change that neither fixes a bug nor adds a feature (refactor)Ĭhanges that do not affect the meaning of the code (white-space, formatting, missing semi-colons, etc)Īdding missing tests or correcting existing tests , where the hash is the SHA of the commit being reverted. In the body it should say: This reverts commit. ![]() If the commit reverts a previous commit, it should begin with revert:, followed by the header of the reverted commit. Gracefully handle when a user has not selected any issues and tries to complete The header has a special format that includes a type, a scope and a subject:įix(stream): Handle empty reference on resolve action Commit Message FormatĮach commit message consists of a header, a body, and an optional footer. If you’re working locally, it often can be useful to -amend a commit, or utilize rebase -i to reorder, squash, and reword your commits. If you’re using GitHub’s UI it will by default create a new commit message which is a combination of all commits and does not follow the commit guidelines. When you are squashing your branch, it’s important to make sure you update the commit message. The GitHub UI exposes a “Rebase and Merge” option, which, if your commits are already in following the commit guidelines, is a great way to bring your change into the codebase. Remember: each commit should follow the commit message format and be stable (green build). Those commits should be squashed, and the final patch when landed should be rebased. This is counter to having a Pull Request which may include “fix behavior”. This means then when you’re building a new feature, you should try to pare it down into functional steps, and when that’s not reasonable, the end patch should be a single commit. That means that every commit on its own should be a clear, functional, and stable change. Each commit should be a single, stable change.Use the body to explain what and why vs.Use the imperative mood in the subject line. ![]() Do not end the subject line with a period.Limit the subject line to 70 characters.Separate subject from body with a blank line.This leads to more readable messages that are easy to follow when looking through the project history. We have very precise rules over how our git commit messages can be formatted.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |